But it's not a good answer to the "Why work here" question because there are tens of large tech companies you could work for. Your interviewer wants to hear why you want to work at their company in particular, not any company which has a similar size.
Mistake 2: "I'm impressed by how fast the stock price is growing. But once again, there are tens of companies which fit that description and it's therefore a really weak answer to the question.
Mistake 3: "Your company is well known. But, when you explain your motivation you should go deeper and outline why you are particularly excited about this company and not another one with a similarly strong brand name.
It's now time to start crafting your own answer. Pick a company and write down why you want to work there in the comments section of this article. Writing down an answer will help you to clearly articulate your reasons, which will help you to provide a quality answer for this question during your interview.
First, I'm excited to join Google because of its deep technical culture. I did a PhD in Computer Science and I know that by joining the company I'll be working with colleagues who are as excited as I am about advanced technology. I like being creative and pursuing opportunities I identify and it sounds like this policy would enable me to do that. Both of them are enjoying their time here and encouraged me to apply to join the team. Notice how the answer above is really specific. If you swapped "Google" for another company name it wouldn't make sense anymore.
If you are interviewing with Google, or with Google Cloud Platform, then you'll find the following resources helpful to put your answer together:. First, I admire how customer-obsessed Amazon is. This is something I've experienced first-hand when dealing with the customer support of the company. And it's also a principle I've been pushing at my current company. He has really great things to say about the company and often talks about how much he learned about product management there.
I look forward to being immersed in that environment. Third, I've spent the last five years of my career in the streaming space and really like that industry. Our emails are made to shine in your inbox, with something fresh every morning, afternoon, and weekend. What was formerly known as Facebook Inc. The move is a nod to the metaverse , an immersive next-generation version of the internet that relies heavily on virtual reality technology.
In the metaverse, you can go to school, go to work, play games, watch concerts, browse store shelves, and much more without ever leaving your home. If the internet is two-dimensional—text and images on flat screens—think of the metaverse as three-dimensional and multi-sensory including touch.
Currently, there are some spaces online with similarities to the metaverse, like the hand-drawn Topia and the virtual reality platform AltspaceVR. If I were Ferrari, I would be thinking about how to ensure IP protection such that someone has to buy a Ferrari offline to show a Ferrari in my metaverse or my Tinder profile.
You essentially would be signaling power and wealth online, which would create a lot of mating opportunities or signaling capability in these metaverses. It gives them an opportunity to talk about the metaverse instead of insurrection and teen depression.
People have been talking about this future for decades and it never really comes close to what anyone has envisioned. The question is, why is there a renewed focus? It comes down to this: If we had a metaverse that dictated our relationships, a place where we kept assets and interacted with politics, then whoever controls that metaverse is the closest thing we have to a scientific god.
The reason this is getting so much attention is because everyone is freaked out by the idea of a scientific god named Mark Zuckerberg. There are some very uncomfortable things about all of this. We live in a capitalist society — money equals options. The people with the most options in the world, specifically Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and Mark Zuckerberg, either want to be off the planet or they want to create a different universe on this planet. It feels like the mother of all abdications. The fundamental mistake people make around these AR or VR experiences is to immediately think of sight as the entry point into a metaverse.
Am I going to pull out my handy Oculus and throw it on my head and start jamming to the Weeknd? The Oculus is not a wearable. Oculus sells like 2 or 3 million units a year? Apple sold million AirPods last year. In fact, Fortnite already has many elements which would conform to the idea such as live events, its own currency, etc. Digital spaces, Virtual Reality games, a virtual world, or even just a game like Fortnite is not the metaverse, according to Ball, though he acknowledges that Fortnite does have elements of the latter.
So the game sort of allows other brands and creators to showcase their products to players. The metaverse is being envisioned as a new world order really, where your services could be offered virtually in exchange for other virtual assets, or Cryptocurrencies.
The way to look at it is that your existence will be enmeshed with the digital world in a much deeper, complex way. On one level it does sound dystopic and most examples in popular fiction where the virtual and physical world have merged live up to that image.
Because everything and everyone is supposed to be a part of this, interoperability will be key. In order to ensure that the metaverse functions smoothly, it would require a rewriting of the current rules as they are for most of the internet services and functions, according to Ball.
A digital world where we spend most of our time interacting with friends, where virtual assets have higher importance, where the rules will be entirely different. Of course, Facebook would want this.
0コメント